Teens 2008 & Some Business Stuff

The motion blur is my fault… I had been shooting something where I wanted a lot of DOF - and didn’t switch back to my usual street mode where I’m usually at 1/500th or 1/1000th. In the old days, they’d shoot with 50 ASA film and you’d see quite a lot of motion blur which was perfectly fine (in those days).
* * *
On a different note, I’ve been doing so many large prints lately, that I just looked at a 16 x 24 that’s drying and it seems small to me. I was able to do one print that I shot at 1600 ASA with the 40D that was 36 inches long. And you know what - perfectly fine. Yes, there’s “noise / grain” but it wasn’t distracting at all. I printed it at 180 dpi after doing some extrapolation with PowerZoom II. I do wonder what MP the 45D will have? 12mp? 14mp? more…?
* * *
Business has been very good lately; with a lot more overseas orders. (Guess that’s ’cause of the drop in the dollar?) The price point of prints on the web is a very tricky thing. Right now it’s about right in terms of getting orders, but it keeps me very busy with printing and packaging. Raise the prices, and sales drop off too much, maybe in half. If you’re running or thinking of selling photos on the web, the single biggest factor in sales is the cost. (Assuming that anyone wants and can find your photos in the first place). It’s especially tricky because you’re not selling toasters. How is anyone supposed to know what the worth of your art is unless you tell them with the price. So if you go too low - gulp - the buyer figures it’s junk. If you go too high - well they’re not looking at the actual work so how do they know if it’s worth it.
In short, my advice (not that you asked) is to be able to easily change prices in a batch and see what happens.
The other thing (and it took me a long time to figure this out) is to spend the money so that you have an impressive catalog / portfolio. For me, this has paid for itself very quickly with an increase in orders from art buyers. The only bit there that’s tricky is that although the art buyer wants to show the potential client the catalog, they don’t want to tell the client where the prints came from - because then their potential client might just buy the print directly. So I wouldn’t do something like print the web address at the bottom of every page (like I did in one early catalog until the buyer told me that wasn’t a good idea.)
Comments
Comment from Eric
Time: June 2, 2008, 10:37 pm
I’m just now getting into the digital world (just ordered a 40d) but I’m guessing the new 5D will be very expensive, possibly hard to justify if you’re happy with the 40D results. Just my two cents.
Comment from Mike Mundy
Time: June 4, 2008, 6:16 pm
How did that “art buyer” thing work? Did they find you? Or did you find them?
Comment from dave
Time: June 4, 2008, 7:21 pm
Mike - I don’t find anyone. Over the years, a number of art buyers have found me. Maybe once a year a new buyer tries me out. There have always been repeat orders from anyone that I’ve worked with. Now that I’m working with larger sizes that side of the business has increased. The only practical issue I have (and haven’t figured out yet) is that the prints which come off roll paper need a place to flatten and dry.
I really only have room to do say one 24 x 36 print at a time. At some point, I’m going to build something with plywood and hinges that can fold up flat and hold a bunch of large prints.
Comment from Henry
Time: June 6, 2008, 8:23 am
Luke, what’s leaked is the name of the update to the 5D, which people on the nets pretty much already knew. Specs are unclear, despite much speculation.
Dave was referring to some eventual update to his 40D, not to Canon’s upcoming $3000 full-framer.
Comment from luke
Time: June 6, 2008, 1:53 pm
Henry - Yes, I realised that afterwards. The 40D replacement will be the 50D, but I don’t expect it until some time in 2009. If Dave wants a resolution boost before 2009, his only reasonable option will be the 5D Mk II.
Comment from luke
Time: June 2, 2008, 4:51 pm
Amazon leaked the name the other week. It’s the 5D Mark II, which most people had guessed at anyway.
Minimum resolution will be 16.7 MP (old 1 Ds sensor but improved). Or maybe it’s going to be 20-something because Nikon/Sony/Pentax are coming out with 24 MP FF cameras later this year.
Also, says Amazon, release date for the 5D Mark II is around October/November (it’s a Photokina year).